Okcupid the dating persona test

20 Jun

They think they can get the right answer to everything just by thinking about it, but in reality intelligent thought requires not just brute-force application of IQ but also domain expertise, hard-to-define-intuition, trial-and-error, and a humble openness to criticism and debate.That’s why you can’t just completely reject the existing academic system and become a self-taught autodidact like rationalists want to do.They try to focus on doubting themselves instead of criticizing others.They don’t pooh-pooh academia and domain expertise – in the last survey, about 20% of people above age 30 had Ph Ds.Like the economics example, these combine basic mistakes with legitimate criticisms levied by rationalists themselves against previous rationalist paradigms or flaws in the movement.Like the electroconvulsive therapy example, they’re necessarily the opposite of reality because they take the things rationalists are most worried about and dub them “the things rationalists never consider”.

I think especially of the late-19th/early-20th century Progressive movement.Remember, lots of Communist-style attempts to remake society along seemingly ‘rational’ lines have failed disastrously; you shouldn’t just throw out the work of everyone who has come before because they’re not rational enough for you.Heck, being “rational” is kind of like a religion, isn’t it: you’ve got ‘faith’ that rational thought always works, and trying to be rational is your ‘ritual’.” is a universally understood counterargument which shifts the burden of proof back on the proponent.They’re not a “religion” any more than everything else is.